<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Audit Alert: Ambulance Services for Part A SNF Residents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://compliancenews.inhealthcare.com/flash/audit-alert-ambulance-services-for-part-a-snf-residents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://compliancenews.inhealthcare.com/flash/audit-alert-ambulance-services-for-part-a-snf-residents/</link>
	<description>Your Weekly Guide to Stark, FCA, HIPAA, Audits &#38; More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:06:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Editor</title>
		<link>http://compliancenews.inhealthcare.com/flash/audit-alert-ambulance-services-for-part-a-snf-residents/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compliancenews.inhealthcare.com/?p=129#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Janet. The OIG’s report does address the *100*-day stay issue, and it acknowledges there are lots of communication problems re: when patient goes from Part A to Part B, as you note.

There has been so much kerfluffle on this topic, I’m going to post a some of the best billing and compliance tips from the Webinar on this blog. Stay tuned …

Erin Lang Masercola, PhD, CPC
Editor, InHealthcare.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Janet. The OIG’s report does address the *100*-day stay issue, and it acknowledges there are lots of communication problems re: when patient goes from Part A to Part B, as you note.</p>
<p>There has been so much kerfluffle on this topic, I’m going to post a some of the best billing and compliance tips from the Webinar on this blog. Stay tuned …</p>
<p>Erin Lang Masercola, PhD, CPC<br />
Editor, InHealthcare.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Selover</title>
		<link>http://compliancenews.inhealthcare.com/flash/audit-alert-ambulance-services-for-part-a-snf-residents/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Selover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compliancenews.inhealthcare.com/?p=129#comment-3</guid>
		<description>When doing the Wedinar, it would be helpful for you to address the 90 day stay issue. I think CMS is forgetting that after 90 days, the patient no longer has Medicare Part A and we are to bill Medicare Part B.  We need to know how to address this and inform Medicare of this at the time of billing so they don&#039;t deny stating pt is in Part A stay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When doing the Wedinar, it would be helpful for you to address the 90 day stay issue. I think CMS is forgetting that after 90 days, the patient no longer has Medicare Part A and we are to bill Medicare Part B.  We need to know how to address this and inform Medicare of this at the time of billing so they don&#8217;t deny stating pt is in Part A stay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

